Reply
Thunderfury, Blessed Poster of arf
Kevorkian
Posts: 4,502
Registered: 12-10-2004
0

Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

[ Edited ]
Verdict: Thumbs down.
 
First 1.5 hrs or so of the movie is HELLA SLOW. I seriously was falling asleep in some parts (being up at 6AM will do it to me). There are some genuinely entertaining parts toward the end, but it's not enough to make up for the drawn out soap-opera portions. Ending was disappointing to me too.
 
Not worth paying for (good thing I didn't).


Message Edited by Kevorkian on 05-04-2007 02:09 PM
Talisman of Binding arf
onions
Posts: 2,525
Registered: 12-10-2004
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

i have very low expectations of this movie. for whatever reason, i just don't think it is going to be as good of an experience as spiderman 2.
---------
Seelia / Funions
Thunderfury, Blessed Poster of arf
Kevorkian
Posts: 4,502
Registered: 12-10-2004
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

Trailer highlights: Harry Potter + new Bourne movie. I'm sooo there for both.
Lorekeeper
Dracus
Posts: 12,329
Registered: 03-15-2005
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

speaking of which...i'm probably gonna do a midnight showing at the Long Beach Marina theater (it's been tradition).  So if anyone wants to go when it comes out lemme know.
They call me Hadouken, cuz I'm down+right+fierce
Talisman of Binding arf
Torba
Posts: 2,445
Registered: 01-08-2006
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)



Kevorkian wrote:
Trailer highlights: Harry Potter + new Bourne movie. I'm sooo there for both.


AND pirates~~!!!
_______________________________________________________________________________
You should convert to the flying spagetti monster or you will spend eternity in a boiling sauce of ragou.
arferated - banned!
pansy
Posts: 1,445
Registered: 01-11-2005
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

[ Edited ]
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/spiderman_3/

only 45% fresh :smileysad:

the first two movies were up in the 80s and low 90s.


Message Edited by pansy on 05-04-2007 05:10 PM
"mark all as read" button... BRING IT BACK!!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pansy - lvl 60 NE "warrior"

i must apologize in advance for any wipes i may cause
start running if i'm the last tank



THEpansy.
I cAn DpS!
Jebus
Posts: 1,317
Registered: 04-05-2005
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

its at 61% now
____________________________
i'm a pc and i'm 4 and a half.
Nytricide
Talisman of Binding arf
Torba
Posts: 2,445
Registered: 01-08-2006
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

soap opera feel made it suck.

The action scenes were nicely done though. Particularly the.....oh well...no spoilers :smileysad:
_______________________________________________________________________________
You should convert to the flying spagetti monster or you will spend eternity in a boiling sauce of ragou.
arferated - banned!
pansy
Posts: 1,445
Registered: 01-11-2005
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

[ Edited ]


Jebus wrote:
its at 61% now



i generally only check the "cream of the crop" rating on the right.  most of those other opinions are from those writing for a no name paper or bloggers who couldn't hack it anywhere else.  that said, i will probably still go see this movie sometime next week.


Message Edited by pansy on 05-04-2007 05:36 PM
"mark all as read" button... BRING IT BACK!!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pansy - lvl 60 NE "warrior"

i must apologize in advance for any wipes i may cause
start running if i'm the last tank



THEpansy.
daboo
wizll
Posts: 5,574
Registered: 12-08-2004
0

Re: Spider-Man 3 (no spoilers)

yes... suck...
and they still managed to take everyone's money anyway.